based on the best possible intelligencand defencadvice

Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

Expand/collapse submenu for Arts & Life

Expand/collapse submenu for Shows & Podcasts

Botched International Submarine Deal Leaves France Feeling Betrayed

Australia brokered a deal estimated at $66 billion with France in 2016 for a new fleet of submarines. But Australia has canceled the contract and will get nuclear subs from the U.S. and U.K. instead.

Why A Submarine Deal Has France At Odds With The U.S., U.K. And Australia

The USS Missouri, pictured in Hawaii earlier this month, is one of the U.S. Navys nuclear-powered submarines. The U.S., U.K. and Australia signed into a partnership last week that will provide Australia with eight nuclear-powered submarines.Chief Mass Communication Specialist Amanda R. Gray/U.S. Navy via APhide caption

The USS Missouri, pictured in Hawaii earlier this month, is one of the U.S. Navys nuclear-powered submarines. The U.S., U.K. and Australia signed into a partnership last week that will provide Australia with eight nuclear-powered submarines.

Australia bailed on a submarine contract with France worth $66 billion last week, choosing instead to work with the United States and the United Kingdom. Outraged, France recalled its ambassadors to the U.S. and Australia.

The Australian Navys six Collins-class submarines are set to reach the end of their service life in 2036. And in 2016, France was chosen over Germany and Japan to help Australia replace its older subs with 12 new diesel-electric submarines. At the time, theAustralian governmentcalled the Future Submarine project the largest and most complex defense acquisition in the nations history.

But that was five years ago. And tensions are on the rise in theIndo-Pacific region, which spans from Americas west coast to the shores of Australia and India. Chinas military and political interests in the region have grown, as has its military fleet, which has more than doubled since 2015, making it thelargest naval forceon the planet. As a result, Australia said it needs a type of submarine France cannot provide.

The security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region have grown significantly. Military modernization is occurring at an unprecedented rate and capabilities are rapidly advancing and their reach expanding, read anAustralian media statementon Thursday. The technological edge enjoyed by Australia and our partners is narrowing.

Australia announced it would join the U.S. and the U.K. in a trilateral security partnership, AUKUS, which lists the development of nuclear submarines for Australia as priority No. 1. Over the next 18 months, Australias Department of Defense will establish a task force to guide the coalitions goal to become a reliable steward of nuclear technology.

China has called the partnership and, more specifically, the sharing of nuclear technology, irresponsible. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Zhao Lijian said the new agreement threatens the stability of the Indo-Pacific.

The nuclear submarine cooperation among the US, the UK&Australia severely undermines regional peace&stability, intensifies arms race and undercuts intl non-proliferation efforts. Its highly irresponsible and shows double standards on using nuclear export for geopolitical /3J3gZWlhLg

Australian Prime MinisterScott Morrison saidnuclear-powered marines are no just a want, but a need: Theyre faster, stronger and stealthier, exactly what Australia needs to protect both its interests and its people. And though he understands the disappointment the French government is feeling, Morrison said in apress conference Sundaythat he had raised submarine capability concerns with France in recent months.

Ultimately, this was a decision about whether the submarines that were being built, at great cost to the Australian taxpayer, were going to be able to do a job that we needed it to do when they went into service, Morrison said. And, our strategic judgment, based on the best possible intelligence and defence advice, was that it would not.

The Australian government has long stood against nuclear weapons. In 1970, it chose to abandon any pursuits for nuclear weapons by signing the United NationsTreaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The development of the new submarines will be Australias first time utilizing nuclear technology. But the subs will be nuclear-powered, not nuclear-armed. Australia has no interest in that. No plans for it, no policy for it, no contemplation of it. Its not on our agenda, Morrison explained.

However, backing out of the deal has left France feeling betrayed, as well as set back a by a costly investment. The London-based policy think tankChatham Housesaid the broken deal will affect thousands of workers in Frances defense industry. More importantly, the institute said, Australias new deal with the U.K. and U.S. has left France seemingly alone on the strategic landscape.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Driandescribed the new partnershipas unacceptable behavior between allies and partners Friday. And the Associated Pressreported Sundaythat French President Emmanuel Macron is set to speak with President Joe Biden in the coming days about the botched billion-dollar-deal. French government spokesperson Gabriel Attal said the surprise was initially met with shock and anger, but that its important to move forward.

The phone call came at the request of Biden, the AP reported, but spokesman Attal said Macron will press the president about what led to Australias new endeavor with the U.S.

based on the best possible intelligencand defencadvice插图